AssetAM takes the condition-monitoring technologies your site already operates and derives a maintenance strategy for every failure mode on every asset: the method, the task, the craft, the interval.
We help teams move from scattered tribal knowledge to a shared, auditable picture of what every asset needs — so reliability work starts from evidence, not habit.
Strategies respect the monitoring technologies you already run. Declare the stack once; the derivation fills the task list so coverage matches reality on the floor.
Unresolved and intrusive-only failure modes are named in the open. Leadership can fund a sensor, accept a risk, or change a process — instead of discovering the blind spot after a trip.
Build the hierarchy — equipment, parts, failure modes — from a curated industrial library, or add your own entries where the library falls short.
Tick the condition-monitoring technologies the site actually operates. Nothing is assumed on your behalf.
Every failure mode is matched to a monitoring method and a task with a craft, a frequency and an estimate. Change one technology and the whole strategy is rebuilt.
Align vibration, oil, ultrasound and the rest of your CBM toolkit with the failure modes that matter — so monitoring effort lands where it prevents downtime.
Craft, frequency and method arrive together. Planners stop inventing PM lists from scratch and start from a derivation grounded in the site’s real tools.
When something still fails, the strategy shows what was watched, what was not, and which intrusive checks remain — a cleaner starting point for root-cause work.
A strategy is only as good as its blind spots. AssetAM names every failure mode left to intrusive inspection or resolved by nothing at all, so a gap becomes a decision instead of a surprise.
Tell us about your operation and we will set up an account for your team.